Lagniappe: an unserious blog
Hancock
I did a very good job of keeping myself ignorant about the Hancock movie, my knowledge coming solely from the excellent and funny trailer that sold me on the high concept of Will Smith as a dissolute Superman and Jason Bateman as the pr agent who tries to revive his bad public image. The trailer didn't even mention the other big star in the movie, who is a favorite of mine, and the sudden twist in the middle of the movie took me completely by surprise. It's been a long time since I've been that pleasantly surprised in a movie (mostly my own fault from reading too much entertainment press), so I wish I could've liked the movie more than I did, but the discordant pieces don't ever gel, and the movie mostly falls apart after a twist that should have made it much more interesting.

Bateman is very funny, the acting of the three leads is good (though the supporting cast doesn't provide a lot of support, and one wants to throttle every child actor who appears in the movie), the funny scenes from the trailer are funny, but not much else works. The directing and camerawork are appalling, two big set-piece action sequences in the middle and end of the movie don't work in the slightest, the writing was mediocre, and someone from the studio really should have done something about the weird and sudden tone-shifts and inconsistent characterization. It doesn't help that the main villain never read the Evil Overlord list. The movie never decides whether it's dark or light, and there's a racial dynamic that's never addressed. Slim complained about weird musical choices, too.

A quick Google search reveals that this was originally written as a very dark movie that got punched up to be more of a kids' movie, but the result kind of gets stuck in the middle without satisfying either goal. The movie is a very hard PG-13, and not appropriate for kids; apparently, the first two cuts were rated R. The seams painfully show where edits were made to satisfy the ratings board, but that really should have been anticipated much sooner and rewritten so the movie isn't standing on the PG-13/R line.

All of this is frustrating, because this easily could have been a much better movie if the script had been a bit more polished and if the director had been less intrusive.
back in the african-american
An American Family Association search-and-replace function was a bit too aggressive when rewriting the story of Tyson Gay's record-setting 100-meter dash.
Viral WALL-E
OK, this is just awesome. Someone spent a long time on that. Don't miss the disclaimers and waivers and privacy policy.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Viral WALL-E
  2. Thoughts on Wall-E (spoilerish)
in the Chicago Tribune
Not entirely thrilled with the slant, but I'm extensively quoted in the Chicago Tribune, and I even had another sentence in the quote in an earlier edition.

Also: lots of GTA coverage on blogs and in the news. The game of telephone is fascinating; the Times made a minor error in summarizing events, and the blog coverage repeating the Times summary confused all sorts of issues. It's not just the amateur gaming bloggers getting things wrong: a short piece on the Wired website had at least five errors in as many paragraphs.